Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
这个剧情。。狼叔居然变身痴情男，一顿反人类的操作看的真的是很迷，恋爱脑真的是不能忍啊！抛开这点不说，故事也是漏洞百出，再加上一些yy式旁白和单薄的人物形象，最后呈现的效果就非常一般般了。唯一的亮点还是阿祖夹带普通话的英语，倒是挺有个性的，扮相也依旧帅炸，但是出场时间太短。总体来说，故事创意可以但是呈现出来却差强人意，一般。
整個故事有著一切高水準科幻片的設定和反烏托邦的世界觀，但空有一個回到過去的科幻設定，水中城市以及階級對立的部分詮釋得很糟糕，更別提片子的主線竟然是男主的戀愛戲，雖然他極力表現深情，但我很難投入到這小情小愛里，尤其後半段情傷後的跌墮太俗套了。從回憶的碎片找到線索，融合愛情與懸疑，但是人物的情感略顯蒼白，男女主角情感鋪墊太少了。
经典高开低走，有些失望…开场就一副要弥补《马戏之王》里的遗憾的架势，随后女主的几个pose不免让人想起《碟中谍5》，女配那段枪战又有点《西部世界》小酒馆的意思，虽然看得爽，但未免有些谄媚。故事后半段乏善可陈，过于无聊了。
马戏之王和瑞典夜莺再续前缘还要什么自行车！！！！！弗妹每一帧都美成艺术！！！！！
故事抽丝剥茧以后感觉配不上这个设定。我想看的是记忆而不是爱情。
疑犯追踪+西部世界。Newton的设定和疑犯追踪里的Shaw几乎一模一样，枪法好，医护，老兵，酗酒。
白瞎水淹迈阿密的迷人末世背景了，竟然真的只拍了个俗套爱情故事，难看
狼叔，英国女特工和西部世界 host 一同控诉万恶的资本主义。
浪漫又伤感，谁不想重温人生中最美好的回忆。如果说银翼杀手是爱情文艺外壳下的科幻片，本片就是科幻外壳包裹下的爱情文艺片，不要抱着想看科幻片的预期去看它。
格局小了，还以为大boss是国际女毒贩呢！浪费一个好题材（也算是圆了马戏之王的遗憾了
大家都在吐槽阿祖的中夹英，我倒是觉得题材还不错有末日危机有阶层矛盾种族矛盾，就是故事讲得太烂了，我很期待这个片子由诺兰来拍
各种意义上的深度催眠，西部世界待业再就业，休叔以后再主持奥斯卡，串词必须加上：我曾经拍过诺兰的电影，后来资源降级了拍了诺兰弟媳的电影
感觉诺兰一家都对记忆有什么不切实际的幻想。
See the people we miss,
丽莎·乔伊作为诺兰的弟妹，在自己执导的作品中满不了会带有一点诺兰家族的叙事元素。而我们也能在影片的背景设置和叙事上看得出一点端倪。
我觉得很好看诶……很久没看过那么纯爱的电影了……
尤丽狄斯终究回荡在梦池之中 夜莺稀碎的记忆是无可取代的孤本
（68）期望太高，浪費了這一臉好演技⋯⋯喜歡城市因為海平面上升的設定，原來還能這樣通過VR YY 那些美好的年華，的確是，nostalgia
对我这样的反乌托邦爱好者，只能送上5星，外加我的膝盖！
末世纪背景下的一出纯美爱情悲剧，角色都选得超到位，个性魅力十足，狼叔虽然比女主大上好多，但CP感依然和谐无比。还被最终的结局引得老泪纵横。只可惜了狼叔的设定，明明是退伍军人，但格斗奇烂，被人狠揍，可能这也算是其转型的一作。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
