Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
看完才明白为什么被各美国杂志评选成年度优秀电影之一，典型的“USA”式电影，外人感受不会那么深，再加上剧情冲突较弱，观众情绪无法带入，也就当作了解了一件事吧，今年奥斯卡能有这片一席之地。
It's not bad, ”but…it's repetitive. ”
就像男主光着身子坐在桌前，却穿戴整齐躺在床上。赌博者和监狱虐囚两个主题穿插得满是违和感，让作为观者的我感到情绪被切割成很多块，无法拼装。
关于救赎的故事，赌场只是背景，预告片和正片是两部电影。
ᐈ住旅馆，将房间内所有的东西都套上自己准备的白色套子，重度洁癖
3.5, 除了节奏慢点还行，有点马丁风格的醉乡民谣，poker场面没看够
监狱VR，感觉就像是没有贴好的hdr环境贴图。一个关于自我救赎的故事。
本质是复仇片，赌博作为男主逃避和麻痹自我的作用完全没拍出来，就是单纯冷冰冰的在赌牌。赌博和复仇的部分割裂实在太严重。感情戏十分差劲，男主与男二的伪父子情戏码，和女主的伪爱情戏码都毫无火花，男二稍微好一点，女主偏喜剧演技与男主的表演以及整部电影的风格格格不入。
新黑色电影与赌片杂糅，鱼眼广角下的战争创伤与幽闭恐惧。保罗·施拉德还是很老派啊，看来年度十佳真是各花入各眼
+。想不到是在讲阿布格莱布和自我救赎。最爱的点在于，秩序与失序两个极端之间，还有一个流动的世界。
累。。PTSD赏析，看完累到不想写影评。。
赌场构造了一个对于性和金钱极度压抑的红黑空间，而沙发，西装的物象，还有反常的视角和怪异的叫声，让这个片有了《双峰》的味道，故一切念头和动作就有了双峰式的合理，亦可称之不合理。最后长达五分钟，两指隔窗而交的，是红、黑和受到极刑至血肉模糊又再度恢复新生肉体，以罪为界，以爱相连。
从头喊到尾的usa，最后监狱成为归宿，一边反思一边讽刺，像是没有力气了。
好久没看过这么男的电影了…以及这么尴尬的对话。证明出租车司机真的无法复刻。
45/100。起码这次能够提炼出一个清晰的主题了，那种在承受巨大痛苦之后无法扭转的后果不至于无法被捕捉到。然而跟《第一归正会》的问题还是一模一样，保罗·施拉德始终把自己凌驾在观众的承受范围之上，想呈现的效果从来不考虑是否能够产生效果，所以我们依然看到的依然是一团浆糊似的东西，漫长无趣的牌桌现场和毫无明确的人物刻画在呆板的镜头下让人无法忍受，在吃到糖果前被灌了一嘴苦瓜的感觉真的很不好。以及全片依然过于依赖演员，从伊桑·霍克到奥斯卡·伊萨克，导演你真的能独立行走吗？Ps.奥斯卡的角色显然比伊桑的更具魅力，有颜有肉让这个可以打入深渊的故事不至于即刻死绝。
2.5；看的时候就觉得是在pandemic期间用无人的赌场拍的，一查Wikipedia果然，用了六天就拍完了。Paul Schrader还是安心写剧本吧，好的影评人未必是好导演。
除了回忆中扭曲的监狱还令人耳目一新外，其他部分实在是不行……开头的气势让我以为他有什么惊天大计划，没想到最后变成失足少年拯救片。
一直以为旅馆用布包住会发生什么，结果啥也没有......
在这个年代看到这种风格的片子，让人感动，节奏缓慢，却又娓娓道来，会讲故事的人，什么时候都可以讲好一个逼近真实的故事。
没有那么差，但是本来以为是什么酷酷的赌博电影结果看到一半才发现是要救赎温情，前面半个小时真挺不知所云的，而且算牌扑克和审讯ptsd两条线好割裂。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
