Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
就这是金球奖最佳动画？这是奥斯卡最佳动画？选不出来可以放弃这项
全程炫技。喜欢luisa那首歌和恐惧自己变得软弱的luisa。
就老生常谈，但这动效是越做越好了。
在我看来，这部电影魔法是有的，欢乐是有的，一贯的载歌载舞也是有的，可以说什么都有，就是没有惊喜。虽然它也没有那么糟，但对于精品频出的迪斯尼来说，中规中矩就等于平庸，就等于倒退。
Disney永远让人又笑又哭又awww又wow 就喜欢这种魔法童话世界！以及LMM真的是带latinx文化和musical出圈了
2022年1月9日15:30，北京百老汇影城国瑞购物中心店
还能跟所有动物交流 实名羡慕
【2.0】仍旧是政治正确口号先行，但相较于近几年的迪士尼动画，明显的进步在于：迪士尼动画中的“自我价值认同”终于不再是通过正邪对抗中打败反派获得胜利的方式来仪式性地完成，而是主人公直接面对那个不确定的消极自我。
这部片子最大的两个亮点就是女主是魔法家族中为一个没魔法的，以及歌吧。我觉得这部片子的歌好现代哦，跟以前的迪士尼歌曲曲风不太一样。但是故事有点牵强诶。因为拿了金球奖才看的，个人觉得这个片子赶不上逃亡。
画面很绚烂，人物矛盾太浅太平，歌舞有点多，两个姐姐的自白曲真的很像《冰雪奇缘》！简单看看还行吧
有隐喻，可以看哥伦比亚的族长制，也可以延伸到南美洲现代国家的历程，但电影选择不展开讲，因为毕竟是迪士尼。剧情很单薄，结局很拧巴，竟然不是一家人都失去了魔力…贾家沐皇恩延世泽
家人之间的关系感觉有点怪怪的，看了影评才醒悟过来原来是讲政治家族的故事。不过画面处理得还是很神采飞扬的，如果不是结尾处理得太潦草可以考虑给到四星。
虽然故事单薄了一点，结尾处理得比较草率吧，但真的是迪士尼近年来最好的作品了。前半部分的观感是让人十分满意的，不仅在于视听呈现，同时也在于迪士尼想要呈现的价值观内核。外婆和米拉贝的对抗所表现出的那种爱与利益的对峙真是让人很是唏嘘的现实，感慨近年来一贯糖水的迪士尼这次竟敢于触及到这种痛点；布鲁诺的预言魔法设定也影射着一种对人们对现实逃避的态度。该片的歌舞叙事简直达到了全新高度，冰雪奇缘都望尘莫及，歌舞叙事场面的丰富想象力以及让人忍不住律动起来的音乐，都是让人极为享受。
全程炫技。喜欢luisa那首歌和恐惧自己变得软弱的luisa。
原声最喜欢
迪士尼还是拍公主吧 这种歌曲高分 画面不错的动画 不适合来个不在审美上的普通女孩 玩具都卖不动。
这这这，看了个神马
画面精致色彩漂亮 但故事人物还有歌都有点一般 有句台词疯狂下头就是说那个男的要给女主sister求婚“他想要五个孩子”to hell with him有子宫吗他🙄️
有些趴很clumsy有些趴明显就是lazy writing，有点浪费了这么妙的Columbian 魔法大房子（*wink*）设定，但在疫情已经折磨了全世界两年的当下，看一个两代Latino快乐跳舞找寻自我的miracle故事好像也很开心。
喜欢炫彩的颜色，喜欢美丽的歌声，喜欢随处的花朵
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
