Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
妥妥为电视机尺寸定制的流媒体电影，叙事流畅，情感真挚，有一些技法上的小聪明。这样的温情小品拿到奥斯卡best picture也侧面反映了疫情之下的世道艰难。
奥斯卡到底还是好莱坞自己的奖而不是全球性的，含金量越来越低，也越来越被zzzq牵着鼻子当犬遛。
好有爱的家庭，和贝利叶一家一样好看。饰演露比的女孩看起来给人一种很舒服的感觉
梦想与亲情，理解与尊重，好故事值得被唱响。
天然的冲突，几乎不需要更多的建构。想到这个构架的编剧也是真商业套路内行。当然，重要的是结构虽然容易，但真情半解的感觉依然能够让人带入这个特别的家庭，因为情感很真挚，且简洁。最后，是天使吻过的嗓音，让人第一次觉得生日歌都是这么音律十足，绕梁一小时。
so cliche and disney🙄️
幸运的女孩儿 幸福的女孩儿
感人细腻，拿Best Picture也说得过去，毕竟政治极度正确。除了少数族裔和LGBTQ，还有残疾人群。从家人看正常听众神态时突然静音让我们感同身受，再到伯克利考试时手语演绎出歌词，两处音乐演唱的桥段设计相当巧妙。
有才华的人，即使流放孤岛，也能衣食无忧、徒弟簇拥、妻儿绕膝，所以还是得多读书，读好书，会读书！
拍的很有套路的治愈系温馨家庭电影，虽然很有套路，但是贵在拍的很真实贴近生活，很自然。影片对残疾人群体家庭亲情的关注和展现，应该是赢得奥斯卡最佳影片的主要因素，或许学院想让大家更关心关注身边可能遇到的残疾人。
剧情：耶教徒德性、学问最高，儒教徒虚伪无耻。韩国属于那种特别极端的类型，信朱子学信得发疯，一旦翻脸抛弃，皈依耶教又信得发疯。
照日深红暖见鱼
聋哑人（更广说残疾人）的心理承受能力是与正常人有差距的，所以可以理解母亲希望女儿出生也是哑巴，可以理解他们对于歧视的愤怒。
天然的冲突，几乎不需要更多的建构。想到这个构架的编剧也是真商业套路内行。当然，重要的是结构虽然容易，但真情半解的感觉依然能够让人带入这个特别的家庭，因为情感很真挚，且简洁。最后，是天使吻过的嗓音，让人第一次觉得生日歌都是这么音律十足，绕梁一小时。
还是挺令人动容的…在一个不正常的家庭长大，还能有唱歌天赋，也算是上天的恩赐了。
歌选的不行，不行法版那么有情感渲染力，比如la maladie damour，听名字就是那么美~包括Audition时的歌也不行，法版的je vole简直太好听太有感觉了
对于这种较老套得看开头十分钟就可以预测整个故事的温情片而言，填充无趣故事骨架的应是细腻真实的触感和流畅自然的脉络。但我看到什么？我看到强行安排的矛盾冲突，看到强化戏剧效果的单薄反派和困境难题，按头让你哭的刻意煽情，莫名其妙的感情和解与升温，有头无尾的的情节废笔。没有一处让人惊艳惊喜，只有颁奖结果出来的震惊。而且还是改编别人的剧本用的现成设定。whatcanIsay
可以做的改动：女儿拒绝打第二句的时候，老师却打对了手语。
《思悼》以政权交替过程里的父子冲突，讲述了儒家秩序下的伦理悲剧；《兹山鱼谱》看似云淡风轻，实际在讲王权与儒学的合谋，把一代代学子纳入体制，成为帮凶。
我用手势开始比划
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
