Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
时间滴答，看起来总是不够用，我们究竟要怎么从梦想与现实抽脱？有时所有破事总会在一刻爆发，鱼和熊掌不能兼得，而这一切都有所选择。
再走一步，再走两步。没有一刻可以浪费
感谢Larson, 对音乐剧的发展作出的创造性的贡献。爆哭。
百老汇圈为了纪念Jonanthan Larsen的诚意献礼。诚意满满但是LMM做导演不太行…七零八碎地往gig里面塞剧情结果两头都别扭。加菲还是一贯的用力型。Vanessa H 不配。龙套卡司显然是LMM在以导演的借口追星。虽说舞台版的三人表演的灵气是难以复制，电影处理也太僵硬了。
3.5，最近期末忙得很，到现在才稍微歇口气看部电影，特意看这部题目比较应景的（期末=倒数时刻）。觉得如果对音乐剧有更多了解，可能看的过程会更有意思。讲述爱好和生活的对抗，顺带还讽刺了制片人制度，人物的成功，天赋当然是最能推动的因素，还有不可被时间磨灭的爱。加菲一脸苦相还蛮适合这个角色，演技到位，情绪和唱功很不错，特别是钢琴solo戏，明年奥提应该到手，泳池五线谱那段想象力到位，虽然其他地方尚可，还可以，没太出彩，行货水平以上，但还是要对这个英年早逝的真实人物表示尊敬，一个把一生奉献给热爱的人。
形式&主题，很明显是冲小金人去的。但相比lalaland，并未感觉有高出哪一块的叙述表达。评委们应该也很难把大奖，事隔五年之后再颁给同类型的影片吧。
又看完忘记标记了？我怎么记得标了啊，比同时看的另一部音乐剧改编好很多，用了很多电影的视听语言去加分！
太難看了 救命 歌怎麼可以那麼難聽？？？ 這個編曲我上我也行 表演也太用力了救命啊
天才早逝。一个热爱音乐剧、希望将其作为毕生事业的年轻人整日在经费不足、灵感难寻、好友挚爱愈发不理解的夹缝中生存，眼瞅即将跨过30岁大关，却还没有拿得出手的作品让世人铭记。当一切成为过往时，他可以用戏剧化的语言、歌曲去调侃，而那些所能展示出的纠结、痛苦恐怕已不及百分之一。作为百老汇与好莱坞炙手可热的当红炸子鸡，导演在片中埋了不少彩蛋，只可惜阅历不足，无法全面体验那份惊喜和感动。以及看起来有必要补一下《rent》了。
主角团的level up章节。
整体OK吧，作为音乐剧缺少记忆点的音乐有点可惜。
Great boring voices and really shitty music…..一分给声音、一分给真情，音乐是真的难听………
那个大姐说的对，写自己熟悉的东西才能引起共鸣，不落俗套的歌舞片，看着各种转场衔接有点儿跳脱，回想起来却是很感动，大概就是音乐和艺术的魅力，以及加菲真是个宝藏男孩啊，没想到！
4.5/5
就唱唱歌，就豆瓣高分了，感觉从电影到领悟豆瓣受众的高分之间的关联性，似乎比电影本身还要有趣。
TV版的下部，猎鬼对的各路大神露面了，开始对卖炭翁和他的鬼妹妹公审批斗，就一个主题想弄死丫挺的，卖炭翁还一个劲解释，毛用，应该黑化，直接反出猎鬼队，加入牛逼的十二月鬼，更残暴一些，目的只有一个救妹妹。
脆弱、神经质都有了。秒针走动的声音也贯穿全剧。但是剧情太跳跃了，经常进不去。
脆弱、神经质都有了。秒针走动的声音也贯穿全剧。但是剧情太跳跃了，经常进不去。
喜欢这种音乐剧附带一些人生哲理的type，可能大家视角不同，个人觉得比爱乐之城好看一些，唯一小遗憾就是最后看到本尊，感觉并不像电影中表现的那个样子
Andrew Garfield的眼神里只有挤不出作品的焦虑和受伤，感受不太到艺术家的疯狂，但Jonathon Larson本人的歌词实在太戳了😭
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
