A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
本片归属于漫威版的“蝙蝠侠”，看完以后，觉得完全没有外界评论的如此之差，作为一个起源的故事，剧情确实非常老套，但有哪几个超英起源故事的剧情不老套呢？！
额，看的时候就感觉时长好长，不是预期中的偷盗片，感觉导演是刻意换了个壳子，不过结尾感觉看着不太爽，为啥就男主一个人没点事，因为哥们你是导演嘛~~
是的，看这个电影甚至没学到开锁的任何知识。
怎么感觉有点虐杀原型的味道，那个曳尾特效太有感觉了，不过啊，剧本烂的一批！
咱不为了钱，咱就为了炫技。| 我能问下既然你需要把耳朵贴在保险箱上，还TMD地用手机放歌剧？路上开车也能听见？这锁芯得哗啦哗啦地响彻云霄了吧
又臭又长。但是内核还挺伤的，这样一个悲剧的，天赋异禀的，永失所爱的，朝着自己悲剧命运前进的小人物。一个小问题，马提亚斯是不是全德国最会咋呼的男人
正传就不太行，衍生的能行到哪去。这个背景故事和开保险柜有啥关系，对开柜没有任何帮助，不还是脸贴在保险柜上，然后不停的扒拉。太平庸了，一点都感受不到紧张刺激！
是因为导演就是主角的关系吗，那么轻易就破解了世界上最难的三个保险箱，就没什么刺激和悬念。但是四个保险箱的内外设计真的迷人。
這哥們在活死人軍團的表演已經夠尷尬了，沒想到還延續放大了這種尷尬。
一条简单线性故事太过单调，反派一目了然，没有反转，单一英雄系类的诞生看太多，有点麻木，唯一看点只有彩蛋。
还是有风格的，看着不累，原来爱情戏份是导演给自己的福利。
事实证明，索尼还是搞不懂怎么拍电影宇宙，开头刚变异那段分镜简直对着阿卡姆系列抄。
首先动作戏是真的难看，其次就是剧情太平淡，简单的像cult片，但是又不够cult片尺度，还有西装配运动鞋真的很难看……
和扎导上来就声势浩大的反类型不同，演员对于作品定位的精准把控和套路的执行，造就了一部保守但不乏小精彩的作品。这样一部烂片衍生出来没人看好的电影，它本身在今年一堆牛鬼蛇神的商业片里，还真不算太差啊，这可真有够可悲的。
对这样一部故事俗气、剧情老套、逻辑混乱、BUG一堆、文戏弱智的超英电影如果能零预期窝在床上流媒体投屏免费看，就。。。。。勉强能看吧！“橡皮人”莱托少爷值得一星，类蝙蝠雷达特效一星，综合两星，不推荐！从没见到过比电影更难看的彩蛋，为了彩蛋而彩蛋，啥都能硬蹭到“蜘蛛侠”上来，漫威的“多元宇宙”真是给这帮烂编剧们找了个可以胡编乱造的好借口，真是yue了，就像是一坨屎！SHIT！前段时间迪士尼（漫威）还说以后不需要中国大陆市场他们的电影也能大卖。WTF？！我看真是飘了，行，以后你迪士尼（漫威）的电影有种都别再中国大陆上！呸！辣鸡！
一部本该两年前就上的片子，各种延期改档，今日终于看完，真的是说不上来的感觉，仿佛看了一部平行宇宙另一个版本的《毒液》，特效可看但剧情逻辑禁不住深究，bug断层太多。
男主一本正经的逗.第二个破解有看头,第三个匆匆带过.黑客妹挺可爱的说.结尾不忘秀恩爱 等警察到场,所以工具人司机...就开车了?飙车都没有- -?这是要拍成一个宇宙?估计男主还有续集,毕竟<活死人>没演出死镜头.还不错 7分吧
设定还不错，但故事有点小打小闹，人物形象比较弱智单一…那个INTERPOL到底是警察还是黑帮？现实里能这样？你就一国际警察在这bb啥 到处对当地人员吼，干啥呢，还大街上捏别人头骨？国际公约都不要了？直接街上暴力逼供？什么弱智剧本真的是无语了
说是前传，说有关联吧，确实有，毕竟导演和结尾找解锁的是2个原班人马；你说没有关联吧，又感觉没啥关联，硬要扯上点啥....
只要你对一件事足够热爱，你就能成为这领域的专家，还能收获芳心，本剧的中心思想。#20211122
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
