Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
央6重温经典，多年再看，还看出来点讽刺意味。
小时候的那些毛骨悚然，那些刻板印象却久久挥之不去，老动画的魅力。
以后再也不会有这样的国产动画了。官方，不管是人间还是仙界，都混蛋。百姓可爱，但又愚昧。依靠反思的仙人和蛋解救世界的幻想。
不知道为什么这部评价这么高……而我小时候竟然没看过……不过总的来说还是挺有乐趣的，尤其是后半部分哈~
小学时候看的了吧，具体忘了，就记得有一个断脚，一个女人，还有一个老女人。。。应该还有一个白衣服飘来飘去的老男人。。。
等了这么久，感觉有点无趣和失望，笑点不多，哭点也没有。
当官的是坏的，
不记得剧情了 找时间再看一次 为毛不把老动画片们翻拍成电影 肯定比现在一堆堆的烂电影好多了
每一帧胶片修复的都是光影与时间。
从美术、分镜到故事立意本身对于国产动画都有着举足轻重的影响，除了全片故事的衔接给我感觉稍微差了点，不过依然能真切地感受到那一代中国动画人的艺术造诣与蓬勃的创造力。此外，无论是看守天书的“袁公”、一腔热血的“蛋生”还是“狐狸精”反派们，都被刻画得栩栩如生；虽是动画角色，却不难让观众产生共鸣。这次4K纪念版片尾附加的10余分钟纪录短片(主要是导演钱运达老先生的采访以及对当年创作的回顾)更是让人对当年上美影厂的老师们的敬佩又多了几分，同时，又倍感遗憾，只因现在这种极具中国本土特色风格的动画长片已近乎绝迹...不知何时才能再有机会在大荧幕看到新的此类风格的国产动画。
我觉得小时候应该看过，但确实记不得了，不知道是不是当时被吓到或者怎样……其实中国动画就应该这样，很有自己的特点，无论是故事还是绘画。层层递进地故事情节丝毫不会让人觉得无聊，每一层毫无拖沓。
结尾又燃又好哭 我可能到50岁还是会很爱看蜡笔小新
满屏的屁股眼睛都看花了哈哈哈。精英教育鄙视链、智能反攻异化、校园本格推理各种类型元素大混搭，结尾借由体育竞赛的热血直接引申到对青春的升华，透过天马行空的故事向人们传达通俗柔软的普世价值。人生于世过得快乐与否才最重要，追逐越多只会失去越多。那些哭过笑过共同度过的美好时刻，才是青春赠予彼此最宝贵的财富。双向奔赴kswl。
小时候最喜欢的动画,没想到这么大了再重看还是这么有意思.
能看到制作团队对独特的民族风格动画的艺术追求，人物形象很生动，水墨场景很美，中国音乐和动画配合得也很好，但可能是受限于体制和时代环境，个人觉得故事和人物性格比较单薄。
前两天还在电视上看到～觉得感情真挚得不行了～非常喜欢
若穿越到现在，像本片大量充斥着“靠蛋生就天赋异禀的死肥仔、又黄又暴力的狐狸精小组、道貌岸然财迷心窍的花和尚、大搞封建迷信的保皇党、欺压百姓祸害人间的朝廷。。。”这些内容的动画片，找逛店总急跟你们丫急呢吧！
游丝描绘众生相，
小时候的动画是中国动画创意和诚意的巅峰，过去很多年都是，而长篇动画电影并不多，但是部部是细致雕琢和富有古典特色的佳作，诸多细节值得回味，人物的精神感人至深，留下深刻印象，比如哪吒，大闹天宫，然后就是这部在当年少有的创作：天书奇谭，KFC还出了玩具套装，就是去的时候没有了。现在，是否是一种倒退呢，诸多
这么早就有full-length了啊，现在国内做动画的都干嘛吃的啊
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
