Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
并未出现《Gomorra》类似的风格，略失望。
导演你这个做法就有点不地道了，找这么美的女主骗炮（骗评分）？话说很多时候女主像极敲敲门里的安娜。
请以你的名字呼唤我的导演瓜达尼诺长期合作的副导演，首次执导长篇，还是自己写的故事，瓜达尼诺也做了制片人，带徒弟出山，一个撞车事故巧合的引出政治绑架案，然后引火烧身，还算有意思的故事，值得注意的是不是好莱坞那种跌宕起伏的悬疑片，而是很平实的欧洲讲故事风格，连配乐都没有多少，7分
貌似很嗨的影片，其实故事很单调，情节线也单一，女主就为了找到女儿干了一票，最后得知被骗，便大开杀戒。其中枪战、动作戏都很一般，没什么特色，冰上追逐稍有些新意，但也挺平平。
不要和陌生人说话，科技以人为本。
Cameron Monaghan从Shameless起一路帅到如今。
女主太美了，要不是为了看她估计都快进了。这颜值身材，omg
有些镜头还可以，其实反应的是母爱的故事，所以当做文艺片看会更好。
2022.4.28 女主角莉莉.库拉格太漂亮了，第一眼看到就心动了，是我见过所有外国女人最漂亮的。就凭这个能给5星，扣掉一颗星是漏洞太多了，她开枪打死继父是什么原因。
难看，啥啥都没有交代清楚，看得没头没尾，一直不喜欢这个女主演员。
这个逻辑实在没法说通，飞机一大堆，随便就送过去了。找几个人步行去送生化武器，什么鬼。
咋说呢，一个还玩着千禧年之前那套的过气编剧再加上一个二把刀导演，怀揣因为哥谭青年小丑火起来的卡梅隆·莫纳汉和约翰·马尔科维奇与弗兰克·格里罗三张不错的牌，在配上三位性感尤物，换来的确实和影片名字一样，支离破碎的一地鸡毛，三十分钟基本上就能看到底的剧情，后面的六十分钟，就是无聊加无聊了，可惜了颜值了，老编剧看来已经不知道现在的电影需要些什么了……
剧情无新意，结局有破绽：为什么杀了自己的后爹！左轮手枪居然有七发子弹！
情节3，表演3，画面3，寓意1，尿点2 = 12/25，48分电影
有演员阵容，但还未上映就有流媒体，逻辑上应该是不叫座。给5-6分吧
虚构战争背景下的战争片+公路片。这种故事最重要的是如何结束，而本片的结束就太过仓促和随意了，不要说提升主题了，连明确主题都没有做到。但如果把本片定位成动作惊悚片的话，那动作和惊悚两个元素都缺失太多。可以和俄罗斯的《科拉深孔》对比着看一下，就知道气质上缺失太多了。Netflix 电影现在开始被大数据给带到沟里去了。
片子有点烂，女主有点美，没让我睡着就值三颗星了！
房东Marlkovici明知风险巨大，还贪十万二十万的便宜; 任何安防系统没有报警键吗？观众都傻子吗？
整部电影就跟名字一样，支离破碎！难看难看太难看了！卡梅隆再胖下去你就只能演这种角色了，好嘛！
女反派身材绝对棒，演技我还可以的，这个角色不错，不过想要以一己之力，战胜小丑和安娜，你配个战狼2反派继父还去把人家杀掉，那你肯定斗不过的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
