性知识3d图片i 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 记录片 1999

导演: Simon Ludgate

剧情介绍

  This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
  THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
  Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
  As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .

评论:

  • 彩彦 0小时前 :

    港片真是没落了,多加一星给阵容和演技。其实是权力金钱的决斗,不过最后的结局也不错,起码没有冤枉了那个小青年。

  • 尧芷荷 5小时前 :

    至少找个不是法盲的编剧来写法律戏吧,这庭审基本可以算是看过的法庭戏里面最傻逼的,一板一眼却感觉比白面包青天里的还搞笑

  • 卫泓舟 6小时前 :

    过程粗暴的不行,最后挽救了一点。

  • 坚茂德 8小时前 :

    高牆與雞蛋,2021,香港...excuse me?

  • 军辰沛 2小时前 :

    怎样定义“公正”,每个人的角度不同,答案也很可能是不同的。法律是有不完善的地方,也有徇私枉法的官员,但法律必须要发挥衡量公正的天平作用,而不是靠某个人用职业经验的“小聪明”来维护,那是对“公正”非常危险的“挑衅”。

  • 心俊 2小时前 :

    《律政强人》精神续作,可惜的是智叔不是演kclau那类角色,作品看起来比较平庸甚至可以讲有点差,哎,以后再也看不到kc刘和张强的精彩对决

  • 寒昭 4小时前 :

    一群老戏骨,可惜故事不行啊,法庭戏太草率了。

  • 任承志 4小时前 :

    是一个可以更加精彩的故事,但拍的略显平庸,普通话版本的对白没什么情感冲击,配乐和剪辑也没有使电影更加好看,最后的理想化独白也是强行升华主题,看完只觉得可惜。

  • 徐雅韵 5小时前 :

    这种类型的港片,应该在80年代末就有了吧,30余年未有变化;方中信、廖启智、曾江等等的作品,80年代末也进入大陆了,30余年未有变化;老戏骨的戏是好,可是剧本是30年未有变化之套路!00后的人肯定不知道港片曾经居然那么辉煌过!

  • 佳树 7小时前 :

    三星半吧,因为故事情节基本和猜测一致!没啥难度!但是不知不觉就看完了,另外方中信也挺帅的。

  • 冯乐邦 2小时前 :

    看老戏骨飙戏超爽也是真的。

  • 利涵桃 5小时前 :

    2019年亚洲电影节的“技术原因”,捱到现在才终见天日;感觉若非廖启智和“扫黑”大潮,也是困难。立项时对四位主演争锋斗戏的预期,被淹没为一个有些轻佻简陋的律政剧“单集案件”;其实完全可以说,这是《律政强人》“Kent”与“KC”的后续吧。

  • 卫芷毓 4小时前 :

    -冲着智叔最后一部电影

  • 乘含莲 3小时前 :

    剧情有点简单,但这是时隔好久第一次有兴致看完的电影,还是酷的。

  • 在香莲 0小时前 :

    脸皮薄的人,当不了“好”律师。不会忽悠的人,赚不了“大”钱………反正我做不到

  • 旗晨风 3小时前 :

    还行把,反正我看完了。虽然感觉剧情不是太紧凑,但是还可以。最后说了一堆冠冕堂皇的话,就是感觉有点突兀。

  • 明从安 9小时前 :

    硬伤还是太多

  • 中蕴美 1小时前 :

    "人死了是没有什么东西可以带走的,这里什么都不重要",因为是廖启智的遗作之一,当他在片中喊出这句话时,总有某种不一样的意义在里面

  • 哲勇 9小时前 :

    最让我纳闷的是廖启智,智叔这个角色既然设定是富豪,而且还是和曾江这个老狐狸合作的富商。怎么就一点动作都没有,都没想过调查下女儿的死?结果还真的没有,哎。。

  • 天祜 4小时前 :

    底色够灰暗控诉够愤怒,老戏骨们的表演很精彩,但主线实在是食之无味弃之可惜。陈家乐也是在警匪片犯罪片里被严重定型的演员之一啊

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved