剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 寒灵 1小时前 :

    我和007的一个共同点,就是想退休后去捕鱼。

  • 卫轩源 6小时前 :

    用邦德重拍“暴力史”。只有古巴任务一气呵成,Rami Malek在商业片里不行

  • 尉迟茵茵 4小时前 :

    今天才在飛機上看,我反而覺得還挺好看的LOL

  • 南宫梦竹 6小时前 :

    连续两部超五星007之后用这种水平让我们和Craig的邦德告别 既然导演残忍 那我打分也残忍 PS 沉默是金的邦德这次满嘴大道理可见剧本是多弱了

  • 始白梅 2小时前 :

    PWB存在感也太强了!蕾老师美得不可方物。

  • 日然 5小时前 :

    这个系列的连续多年观影,真的已成情怀,丹尼尔最后一部?仿佛又再次告别青春。with 斌 @汉阳imax

  • 喆晨 3小时前 :

    画面设计非常细腻华丽。而丹尼尔·克雷格的007的剧情模式真是一如既往……剧情仅仅是一幕幕动作戏之间的连接点,因逻辑不通顺而连接得断断续续。这一部boss则在007的谢幕演出下成为将其缔造为悲剧英雄的工具人,从而显得结尾过于短促。我不禁思考结尾这一幕幕如果不是影像,而是以漫画的形式,是不是能营造出意犹未尽的感觉。画面在骤亮后在一个个格子里变黑——“The End.”

  • 彩菡 0小时前 :

    作为真探导演的电影真是太失水准了,极度失望。

  • 妍碧 0小时前 :

    糖里有屎…邦德谈恋爱的时候真的是…说土味情话都烫嘴…但能在大银幕上专心看3个小时我男人,还有啥好抱怨的

  • 允以彤 6小时前 :

    2.看了James捧着Felix的脸的样子,才知道他对邦女郎有多敷衍

  • 卫诚化 2小时前 :

    他退休了又復出了,他放下了舊愛確定了心的歸宿,他的代號被一個完全不像他的人繼承,他在火光中為James Bond這個名字畫下此段旅程的句號。作為Daniel Craig的007謝幕作,故事能看出本有瘋狂的可能,卻還是以現在這樣更平穩更安全的方式落地,雖然驚喜欠奉,雖然有些角色刻畫不夠豐富,不過當電影結束,還是會不自覺有些傷感。

  • 昔情韵 7小时前 :

    刚看完,有点失望。整个电影流于表面,深层内核完全为零,而且,它逻辑不通啊!!!抛开那些不靠谱的生物相关的专业知识,还有现实中做实验和搞生化武器的基本常识,这电影的整个故事就莫名其妙,反派莫名其妙,女主也莫名其妙。看完就觉了钱白花了。两星一星给男主演员,一星给道具特效组

  • 卫宇昂 8小时前 :

    对幽灵党的剧情全没印象了,当新的看。古巴女配是银翼杀手2049的VR女友。

  • 寸雅逸 5小时前 :

    这片子实在一般啊,本来想看2D杜比影院,临时和朋友看了3D,大可不必,3D就是骗钱。剧情嘛看不太懂,对新观众有门槛。反派嘛,我喜欢的拉米也没立住。片段太散,合着安娜就是为了存在而存在。音画出戏。太老派。现代观众啥没见过,对这个还能买账吗?为结尾的007落幕多打半颗星。

  • 房晗蕊 3小时前 :

    还记得初中那会儿,克雷格刚上任邦德,还被嫌弃年龄大,长得不够帅,现在克雷格已经是性感男人代名词了。不知道是邦德滤镜,还是重塑大家的性感认知。🤔

  • 加侠 3小时前 :

    就不能稍微编得不那么弱智吗?稍微就行!邦德也面目木模糊了,一段一段的,都不像同一个人的表现。这部确实有点不传统。邦德也小幽默起来了,也开始老婆孩子热炕头了,厉害的女主相当于没有了。黑007也不出彩,反派也多弱智,很多动作戏也是弱智。suv追逐那段还行。我找了一个比较好的imax看的2d,还是感觉有些黑,不知道是影厅原因还是片子就这样。另外就是动态的镜头,横摇的大场景什么的,都糊成一片,又糊又虚。希望当代观众尽快进化一下品位吧,不要再说什么高帧率像游戏。固守着老旧不好的定律没有意义,哪怕是多年给你养成的习惯和传统也并不是不进化的理由。

  • 敛鸿哲 3小时前 :

    丹尼尔克雷格的眼神戏真是很有魅力,爱恋忧伤和最终的赴死,无论是车戏枪战的淡定从容,还是大义凛然又不失绝望,都会被他的蓝眼睛迷住。真想最后爆炸的瞬间,他能逃出小岛,接着下一部的007。片尾曲太棒了,太喜欢了。另,特意查了他的身高,竟然和河正宇一样,不矮,但是不显个儿。

  • 恽诗柳 4小时前 :

    几年前标记想看的时候:希望007走出萨姆.门德斯的阴影,重新回到爆米花电影典范的正确道路上来。——对不起我错了,简直垃圾。根本不是no time to die,所有的剧情和台词就是丹尼尔克雷格在表达he has no reason to live.

  • 卫镇宽 2小时前 :

    作为真探导演的电影真是太失水准了,极度失望。

  • 司徒春兰 3小时前 :

    Lorsque la ville s'endort 7.4/10

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved