Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
那么多至尊宝，这个最恶心的。
2.感情过渡有点过快了，紫霞喜欢至尊宝太快了
剧本感觉串的蛮好！作为不知名电影的话，感觉很好了，不算消费情怀！值得一看！
怎一个尬字了得！除了达叔，就女主角的颜比较亮眼…请不要再消费《大话西游》了好吗？
三星中肯，不褒不贬，这个主题被安排了20多年，算是一个不太圆满的句号吧。
紫霞是后期所有版本中找的最对的一个，最有紫霞气质的容貌了，整体故事还不错，只是最后大战有点太拉垮，五毛特效的无脑剧情冒充高潮有点不尽人意，其余都还不错，选景和音乐都挺认真，开篇音乐不错，后期结尾音乐有点不够味。
导演你看周导的大话西游的时候会不会羞愧到撒把尿把自个淹死。
这版故事智商在线，紫霞灵性十足，打分是不是太低了点？
刨除达叔的情怀加分外，也挺不错的，至尊宝和紫霞在城门上的那段与周星驰版一样的感人。另外女主也还蛮可爱的。
可能特效画面演员都没有做到很好，但这个剧本是我喜欢的，每个个体面对“燃尽”的命运都可以选择逆天改命，即便是反派。模仿的无厘头喜剧的地方也都蛮有意思，总之，通片我共情了。（并且打算再刷一遍大话西游经典系列）
居然故事很不错，看到那个城门楼，看到那片芦苇荡，一摸一样
看了半个小时，就忍不住来记号下。
有点意外的好看~比刘镇伟的狗尾续貂强多了~除了达叔，还意外看到了好多星爷电影里的配角~
三星半吧，为达叔加半星。ps一看到男主就想到欢乐颂的渣男应勤……
存在很多不成熟，然而内核确实是真大话紫霞的演员非常加分
电影挺一般的，说不上多好但也绝谈不上差。紫霞对着至尊宝那句话挺动人的：我一直想把你变成我喜欢的样子，可我，早以离不开你现在这个样子。
女主有紫霞的感觉，总体拍的很好了，比预料好太多。分低了。希望有未阉割版
后面有点燃～女主还挺好看的。
三代鹿人推荐来看的，看完了怀疑他收钱了。这一点儿都不俗套的剧情配合一点儿也不落后的镜头语言再配合一点儿也不会让人出戏的女主，真是绝！
继灵魂摆渡后第二个没打低分尽情辱骂的网大…虽然制作仍是存在问题，奇怪的台湾腔和男主选角，但没有垃圾翻拍低质魔改，把很多年前看的紫霞那一块补齐了，故事情节挺合理的
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
