伦理和逻辑的区别 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 记录片 1990

导演: Catherine Gale

剧情介绍

  A sharp, witty, mind-expanding and exuberant foray into the world of logic with computer scientist Professor Dave Cliff. Following in the footsteps of the award-winning 'The Joy of Stats' and its sequel, 'Tails You Win - The Science of Chance', this film takes viewers on a new rollercoaster ride through philosophy, maths, science and technology- all of which, under the bonnet, run on logic.
  Wielding the same wit and wisdom, animation and gleeful nerdery as its predecessors, this film journeys from Aristotle to Alice in Wonderland, sci-fi to supercomputers to tell the fascinating story of the quest for certainty and the fundamentals of sound reasoning itself.
  Dave Cliff, professor of computer science and engineering at Bristol University, is no abstract theoretician. 15 years ago he combined logic and a bit of maths to write one of the first computer programs to outperform humans at trading stocks and shares. Giving away the software for free, he says, was not his most logical move...
  With the help of 25 seven-year-olds, Professor Cliff creates, for the first time ever, a computer made entirely of children, running on nothing but logic. We also meet the world's brainiest whizz-kids, competing at the International Olympiad of Informatics in Brisbane, Australia.
  'The Joy of Logic' also hails logic's all-time heroes: George Boole who moved logic beyond philosophy to mathematics; Bertrand Russell, who took 360+ pages but heroically proved that 1 + 1 = 2; Kurt Godel, who brought logic to its knees by demonstrating that some truths are unprovable; and Alan Turing, who, with what Cliff calls an 'almost exquisite paradox', was inspired by this huge setback to logic to conceive the computer.
  Ultimately, the film asks, can humans really stay ahead? Could today's generation of logical computing machines be smarter than us? What does that tell us about our own brains, and just how 'logical' we really are...?

评论:

  • 官敏才 9小时前 :

    3.5。看看人家在拍什么,再看看……别的不多说了,Sarah一哭我也跟着哭,朱迪科默演戏真是老天爷赏饭吃。

  • 侯?涵育 2小时前 :

    疫情下,被抛弃的永远最先的是所谓的对社会无用的人,悲哀(2021.11.26 星期五 沐陂)

  • 卫舒帆 7小时前 :

    利物浦口音真滴上头啊hhh啾迪演技越来越好了!祝早日获得小金人!

  • 京半槐 3小时前 :

    现实比电影里还要绝望无助与残酷,大时代之下渺小的个人被牺牲在数字里

  • 弥依晨 4小时前 :

    挺写实,也挺揪心,因为是短片合集,确实有点割裂,如果是肯洛奇拍估计我会看崩溃。

  • 敬昊焱 4小时前 :

    这是所看第一部以新冠为背景的电影。

  • 依初南 5小时前 :

    我愿意用看dont look up的时间再看一次help

  • 姓阳霁 4小时前 :

    谁来管底层人们呢,谁去为那些露宿街头的人难过,基础保障太提现一个国家的治理水平了。朱迪就是那个无助的人,演技无声无息地侵入角色本体,封神了。

  • 慧洁 9小时前 :

    Jodie Comer是个好演员,比国内的片子更能打动人

  • 惠映天 0小时前 :

    短评里有一句话也正是我想说的:关于这场突如其来的灾难,别人在拍什么,我们又在拍什么?

  • 奈依霜 1小时前 :

    nobody is coming.医疗体系崩溃真是太绝望了

  • 强国 5小时前 :

    还是老一套的个人微观角度进行剖析,批判和反思也很直白、具体、有力。

  • 万俟玲珑 5小时前 :

    描述疫情的好片,人性的光芒只从个体细微处闪现

  • 但白梦 9小时前 :

    原来是关于疫情的片子哦,敢拍也有的拍,更是会拍,中间那段跟拍不错。

  • 应怀绿 5小时前 :

    这一部疫情题材的电影着重的范围就比较小,对于清晰深刻的刻画矛盾是有优势的。但导演还是比较克制隐忍,除了结尾怼着镜头喊的那一段,其他对疫情中矛盾的刻画都集中在疗养院的工作、在与急救中心和警察的沟通中,以及用主角照顾病人,疲于奔命后的崩溃和无助来传达大时代下渺小个人的主观情感,朱迪科莫的表演很有说服力。不过Sarah和Tony的感情来得比较意外,或许可以理解为底层可怜人的互相依偎吧。

  • 初骏 1小时前 :

    这真的好棒,Jodie真的能演,中间她崩溃落泪我也忍不住跟着哭出来,后面在警车里对着镜头愤怒质问也是冲出屏幕的情绪,外加怼着脸还不时晃动的手持镜头,太有代入感了,面对人类历史上最严重的疫情,一个普通人是有多么无助

  • 卓映菱 0小时前 :

    第一次看有关新冠相关的影片,是帮助还是求救?放大到对整个医疗系统对体制对个人思想的疑惑

  • 弥问凝 3小时前 :

    好家伙,你瓣共情专供片哈。这片子的剧情走向挺迷惑的。

  • 岚桐 6小时前 :

    挺好的题材,可惜拍得有点平淡,女主还意气用事,摔电话,能救都联系不上了,好伐?

  • 延鹏云 1小时前 :

    第一次看有关新冠相关的影片,是帮助还是求救?放大到对整个医疗系统对体制对个人思想的疑惑

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved