Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
影片的美术还是差一些，杨总镖的脸捏得太憨厚了，简直路人。远全景的画面不够丰富，局部细节也一般。如果全片采用闪回时的2D动画效果，能使整部电影更成熟，武侠氛围更浓厚，口碑也会更好。
虎墩是我最讨厌的主角了，各种作行为，害惨大家
还不错有立意的故事，好几个片段都处理的不错。考虑到是国产动画，还是可以多一星鼓励一下
就算寒冷无比的冰海，就算分分钟钟在枪林弹雨中丧命，寻找女儿的母爱不息。
听说女儿下落不明，兄弟你说的对，人类存亡我责无旁贷！
大家都好严格哦，我觉得这片子不错。没交代太多背景，简单粗暴直述任务过程，我看着挺爽的。至于缺点嘛，就是立意不够高远。要真有生化武器，你现在毁灭了也只是推迟而已，并不能拯救世界。何况如果对方提前用了呢？所以结局才显得圣母且生硬。不管如何来看战争还是太残酷了。
给人看完血压飙升会被气死…这动画确定不会给小孩们造成错误的引导方向吗？当中的虎墩真就是一个又任性又没有什么教养，无法无天目中无人的嘴强王者，干什么都是莽，给周围人带来麻烦，还会害死人，直到事情已经发生之后无法挽回才后悔，不过下一秒又开始各种作，这也还只是在动画片里面了，要是在现实中小孩模仿这样后果不堪设想…其次就是这个故事也挺糟糕的，作画也就那样没啥说的
虽然不是好莱坞出品的，但是也算是一部不错的战争片。
一般，太多bug了，母爱拯救世界也可以毁灭世界！
为了纪念主角的英勇行径，国际奥组委将冰上追逐运动纳入了冬奥会，并命名为短道速滑。
整部电影探讨的问题是“谁是敌人”相比以往敌我分明的战争片，这部电影对“敌人”做了深层次的探讨，片尾升华的部分告诉我们一个道理，人不是天生邪恶，但有时候一意孤行达到目的往往会变得邪恶。女主的觉悟从失去希望开始，也就是说，如果你剥夺了人的希望，那么你就会成为真正的敌人。
片子质量真的比预期高出很多，尤其是人物、场景、动作特效的亮点极为突出
剧本稍差 虎头蛇尾老毛病 摄影美术服化道俱佳 评分稍低 劳米的认真劲值4星！
前半小时我以为是全镜封锁电影版，半小时后就发现是个烂片，在这么危险的环境下，一休息，就脱掉装备防弹衣，速滑送生化武器？有飞机不用？唉，女主难看，但是演技还行，最后结局有点美好了吧！
这评分也太低了！其实片子还是不错的，前期节奏还是在线，就最后的反转有些突兀。
小队旅程还算套路之中，到达目的地后反而比较儿戏了
滑冰中進擊，挺有新意的，女主演技不錯哈！看它上映時間如果宣傳蹭熱冬奧也許討論度熱一點
第1次看这种瑞典的动作片，而且是在滨海上滑冰的战争片，还有点新意，觉得女主还很强悍，为了爱，为了孩子爆发出所有的战斗力。最终发现被骗以后，做出了伟大的牺牲。整个人物的塑造和主题还是有些欠缺，但是自己竟然还是看完了。
一般，太多bug了，母爱拯救世界也可以毁灭世界！
因为女儿在目的地，所以就把可以毁灭人类的病毒带到了目的地，又因为被骗了，所以就把可以获胜的生化武器销毁了，既然要做婊就彻底点，不要又圣母又婊
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
