A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
黑白片时代的谍战经典，彩色修复版依然极具年代感，隐秘战线的英雄们都是特殊材料制成的，为了坚贞不屈的信仰牺牲一切。
要论，这部片应该还有个标签，那就是“教育片”。
“特别好特别好就是……我特别特别想你…….”拼命忍住眼泪最后报数那边泪崩。 中国志愿军永垂不朽！！
宝塔山 坏蛋的大浓眉 原来男女搭配干活不累的传统由来已久 估计潜伏也是学得这个
死了两个连的人炸桥，美军用飞机就把桥修好了，有点替他们不值得。大过年看的哭兮兮
很给力的，果然是非常经典，我哭了，在李英雄被日本人折磨的时候，后来快解放了，他在敌人到来的路上还坚持发报，为了完成任务，被抓。。。。。。我哭的眼睛都肿红了
宝塔山 坏蛋的大浓眉 原来男女搭配干活不累的传统由来已久 估计潜伏也是学得这个
最后泪目了，他们牺牲了，但是他们是永不消逝的电波，一直活在我们心中，当时历史条件下，他们内心对祖国那份坚定真的是如磐石一般
4k黑白转彩色修复版。首部大荧幕观看的国产老片，故事丰满，情节紧凑，演员表演和情绪渲染都很到位，无论是在放在当时还是现今重温都当属一部佳片。
新中国的成立，是因为有了千千万万个像“李侠”这样甘于奉献，勇于牺牲的烈士的付出。他的存在如同一块“砖”，哪里需要往哪搬，不仅爽快接受新任务，还能对新人“兰芬”在革命情感和业务上进行传帮带。演员的年龄和剧情虽然距离现在有段时间，但他们真实的演技、真挚情感的融入却把那段岁月栩栩如生地带到观众“面前”。“电波”就像一颗革命的种子，是火把，是光明，更是希望。一个“李侠”倒下了，背后还有千千万万个“李侠”前赴后继。我想，正是因为心怀“革命必胜”的信心，所以李侠烈士在被捕时可以面带微笑地说出“同志们，永别了，我想念你们”的话语。特别喜欢最后的那段蒙太奇，浪漫而生动，升华了整个主题。
看了彩色修复版，真好啊，有了色彩就格外鲜活，而且服装色彩也更能传达角色设定（很喜欢姚苇那几条领带的颜色x）。希望能看到更多老片子的色彩修复版。
太后国庆档里唯一想看的电影。彩色修复版，感谢科技修复时光。也许是排片少观众比较集中上座率还不错。大都是看过的来看看彩色版，老一辈轻声细语给年轻一辈的讲解，出来一个介绍一个，熟悉程度不输现在的年轻影迷。这也是很动人的电影故事。@新杨湾 with 太后
在电影院看的 第一次看 像美术一样 真好看 向这样崇高的革命先辈们致敬！
黑白原片拍摄于1958年，算是《潜伏》的爷爷辈了。电影故事跨度从1938年一直演到解放后，简简单单一部文戏就把共产党人英勇不屈坚定不移的战斗精神展示全面了，根本用不着《金刚川》《长津湖》《八佰》里那样炮火连天血肉横飞的表现手法，却依然让人感动不已。PS：孙道临老师虽然发际线有点高，但整体形象真的是玉树临风啊！
* 一刷 2019年7月13日
最后一分钟“营救”电台版，除了节奏现在感受太慢，情感烘托还是很浓的。
经典电影值得去电影院看一下，黑白变彩色，艺术家们更加生动。
十七年电影能做成这样已经很不容易了 但是修复和上色真的让时空的意义真正从屏幕里走出来了
连敌人都赞叹他发电报的风格“点划清楚，间隔分明，好像一汪清水。”在无数深夜里传出的宝贵情报，如同跳动的脉搏永远存在于革命的血肉之中。为了信仰和使命可以付出一切，这些默默无闻战斗过的革命先烈值得被永远铭记。（4K修复版）
正好和《兰心大剧院》一前一后上映，都看了。两部谍战片，一部当代拍的彩色转黑白，一部当时拍的黑白修复成彩色。一部风格化小景别摇摇晃晃，一部程式化有板有眼端端正正。可前一部我觉得矫揉，后一部我却觉得真实，我被打动了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
