You are never fully liberated from Auschwitz, 11 July 2016 Author: Red-125 from Upstate New York The French movie "À la vie" was shown in the U.S. with the translated title "To Life (2014)." It was written and directed by Jean-Jacques Zilbermann. The film is a Post-Holocaust saga, although it opens with scenes in Auschwitz that are truly horrific. Hélène (Julie Depardieu) and Lily (Johanna ter Steege) were friends in Auschwitz, and they managed to survive the death march from Auschwitz to Louslau together. A third friend, Rose (Suzanne Clément) was unable to walk, so they were forced to leave her behind. As it turned out, Rose survived until the liberation of Auschwitz. The three did not see each other again until 1962, when they come together for a reunion at a beachside resort in Northern France. We learn early in the movie that Lily divorced her husband after the war, and is living as a "free soul," with no permanent partner. Hélène and Rose both married concentration camp survivors. The plot of the film--based on the lives of three actual friends--revolves around their interactions during the reunion. No matter how much ice cream they eat, and how they display their new bathing suits, thoughts keep circling back to Auschwitz. They quarrel about tiny details which they remember differently. They revive horrible memories. It's clear that the reunion will change their lives, but whether the change will be for the better or for the worse is an open question. For reasons I don't understand, "To Life" caries a terrible IMDb rating of 6.1. Fortunately, we saw it as part of the excellent Rochester Jewish Film Festival. If we hadn't had "All-Event" tickets, we probably would have stayed home. This is a movie to be seen, not missed. Ignore the rating and seek it out. It's available on DVD, and it will work well on the small screen. See it!
三星半，可以批评卖拷贝用石破天惊的美学炒冷饭，也可以批评封闭空间制造的戏剧冲突老套且翻拍难度过低，但是人家的确回到了自己最舒服的区域，而不必担心IP携带的累赘文戏和宏大设定对节奏的干扰，达至紧张刺激的观感。无人机镜头代替轨道增加视觉冲击，可运镜方式莫名其妙（中性）。可惜卖拷贝已经被边缘了，尽管比大多数主流动作片都好，可他的成品也只能定位纯类型片了，所以剧本略显粗糙，经常有让人看不懂的戏份，比如一个江湖大盗为什么会领养孩子，比如在老墨基地里两次中枪大量失血的警员还能容光焕发地对话，比如为什么警方提前设好的陷阱还能被人反制。于是，比起英雄无归，本片美国主旋律的味道更加浓烈，急救员、警察、军人严守自己的（哪怕是曾经的）职业道德，家人相互守护，目标观众范围更小，明显是美国中年人。
以为是个自然灾难片，然后发现是外星人，更没意思了
真不敢相信这是拍过2012的导演。虽然能看到有很多痕迹，期待越高失望越大。
离最大的谱，扯最大的蛋òᆺó好在特效还算好看……看完后忍不住吐槽，米国人的格局属实是太小了，拯救地球这么重要的事怎么能在个别人手上下赌注呢，得依靠全球命运共同体呀！
4.3分。三点感受：
流浪月球。非常割裂的故事主题，明明是要捍卫大局，却非要来个自私的视角，展现一下所谓的人文关怀。和那个被夸上天的国产片，缺陷都一样。没有了种族滤镜，评分终于自由了
最简单的提高观赏性的办法就是把地球故事的部分剪辑掉半小时， emo的部分剪辑掉半小时。这样剩下的90分钟我们就看看外星人，看看月球，看看灾难片大场面就不错。
预期调的已经超低了
创意好，格局大，野心大，灾难片变科幻片。Roland Emmerich重塑灾难科幻老本行伟观的同时，欲融入动人情感戏却一塌糊涂，费尽心思和精力铺垫出如此庞大的“远古人类打造AI月球”世界观，最终呈现效果仅是用一枚炸弹消灭一团人工智能黑雾？陨石砸落，海啸水淹，山崩地裂，海啸巨浪吞没中的航天飞机烈焰喷涌奋力发射顶级燃情四起！支线加塞大量跑题文戏拖延进度，法庭戏和主角父子线纯属多余，我喜欢的小奶猫Charlie Plummer和中资硬塞进来的于文文可怜地沦为工具人，与之伴随的还有KC这类总会出现的脸谱化角色甘愿牺牲，我喜欢的Michael Peña同样亦沦为炮灰，可笑可恨。竟然发觉片中Patrick Wilson莫名和Chris Pratt相像。
天上是三个准备牺牲自己拯救地球的太空人，地上是为了生存不停逃命的普通人，剧情的呈现可能只是差强人意，但情感共鸣确实蛮不错的
拍的整个地球就这么几个人有智商，其他人就是发核弹，发核弹，发核弹。
did jake gyllenhaal agree to do this thinking “i have to do a michael bay movie so my hollywood career is complete”
都是2012和后天的cliché，关于我们起源与一切的真相何时才能揭露？？
美国平民英雄再一次领先美国政府拯救了世界。这部片放在20年前可能会火的一塌糊涂，但是在如今观众连3D都厌恶的时代，实在有点乏善可陈。科幻片的想象力也只能靠灭世的灾难场景来充当卖点。那一套外星创世说，感觉就像在看什么抖音未解之谜一样，而且那唯一一点的科幻剧情时长，还就跟2个抖音短视频差不多。于文文这个角色的加入真的可有可无，要说不是带资进组我都不信，整个角色换成白人或黑人、或干脆整个删掉，对剧情发展和人物成长毫无影响。就连开口说那几句中文都看不懂有啥意义。不管是对付外星人、还是自然灾难，美国人拯救世界的方法只有炸炸炸，而且关键时刻一定是平民舍己为人，而不是公职人员。最后感叹，哈利贝瑞这么多年了还是这么好看。
一个抢过38家银行的专家，居然没有其他备选计划，就这么硬刚，枪战飙车也没什么新意
外行看热闹，内行……跟外行一起看热闹。认真你就输了。大场面有，但是好多似曾相识，而且，也不够多啊。
看之前真的没想到会这么难看，毫无新意的故事配上毫无心意的动作场面，辅以迈克尔贝一贯的尴尬笑料和环拍镜头，整部电影带给我的只有喧嚣。看简介以为有三方混战，剧情反转啥的，结果真就追了大概一个小时的车，而且是那种最普通的追车戏，你哪怕学学《生死时速》呢。搞笑的是台词里还cue了导演自己的《勇闯夺命岛》和《绝地战警》，也不知道导演自己会不会因为不复当年而尴尬。
剧情台词也全部稀碎，从一开始就不明所以的奇怪配乐真的是有点啥大毛病，结尾处慢镜头＋洒狗血真的是看得我尴尬癌都发作了
确实非常难看的一部作品，迈克尔.贝再次突破了下限。无人机翻转运镜搞得人眼花缭乱，剧情真的让人崩溃，两个小时讲了一堆烂的不能再烂的毫无逻辑可言的GTA警匪追车大战，看得我都快被救护车带走了🚑
另外加拿大人于文文的角色在美国人心里就是一个保姆啊
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
