Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
奇幻之旅，就像是听了一个童话故事，只不过没意思罢了！
弱化版《木乃伊》
就中规中矩的探险片吧。我睡了半小时接着看的，一点不影响理解。
男主最开始带着那些游客在河上挺逗，和当地人串通好，布置唬人的剧情，布置唬人的场景，哈哈
看似是网飞流水线上的动作爽片，大女主复仇，拳拳到肉，刀刀见血。剧情当然也是为燃而设置，孤女15h之间的相爱相杀的确站不住脚，但本片的优秀之处在于东西方流行文化的冲撞与融合。霓虹年轻人、J-Rock、街头动漫等pop culture的元素以及东瀛文化中人与人之间的羁绊、日本黑帮的家信念年等都有着不突兀的融合。伍秃怎么又演迷人坏爸爸！
迪士尼真人样板戏一向不负众望，集齐了枯燥乏味冗长三要素，感觉就是为了烧掉什么年度指标而做的，不服就再看三遍《时间的皱折》好了。
幼稚版加勒比海盗？我不管，巨石强森很可爱哈哈哈
低配版《夺宝奇兵》？双主角有点火花，就是剧情设定还是比较俗套。
除外很迪士尼，然后怕蛇爱好者慎入
欢快的爆米花电影，巨石强森现在这类题材的片子实在拍得太多了，可以搞一个大杂脍放在一起算了，孩子们还是喜欢这类有点魔幻题材的冒险历险记。
3星半 好看啊 要鼓励多拍这种类型的片啊 迪士尼还是迪士尼 cool
套路到我都感受不到这部电影的优点……纯当作干活的背景音乐来对待了……
╮(╯▽╰)╭
巨石强森的那句“你尿裤子上了吗？长裤女士”简直笑死我了。
挺好看的。可惜已经能看到艾米丽布朗特已经开始老了。大片爽片，搞笑又精彩。
一个人盖出一个镇的奇幻雨林RPG。背景、动作、女主角的彩妆都很绚丽，各种赏心悦目，情节和逻辑啥的重要吗👻
很便利的诅咒。花瓣演得不太行，没猫猫演得好。
Good news: No way they gonna do a sequel.
最后UMP弹夹取出一颗.45子弹放到春田1911枪膛的创意即合理又出彩👏🏻👏🏻
这可不就是迪士尼游乐园里面游乐项目的加长版吗，哈哈哈哈，给你把没法在游乐园里面呈现的剧情都给你演了一遍，很欢乐啊，作为合家欢的爆米花电影还挺喜欢的。迪士尼是不是对那个时代的英国女博士是不是情有独钟，这个电影里面是，泰山里面也是。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
