Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
包袱薄薄的一层，缺乏一层层抽丝剥茧的动机解释。虽说影片内涵的社会意义重大，但既然选择制成电影，至少要有讲好故事的觉悟
打完七发子弹，换弹夹，很真实！
《误杀2》是把真相一点一点的告诉你
而是英语
非常扎心的现实题材，桑婆这是奔着拿奖去的啊。
一个国家真正的强大。是看它怎么对待自己国家的弱势群体。
印度电影质感还是不错！其实一开始就猜到了，女主只是借孩子让妇女qj案受到关注。电影结局很美好，现实真的改变了吗？
演技可以的，剧情悲伤真实又荒诞。一方面，案发时没人去深究真相，连枪械指纹、火药反应都略过没测。一方面，年轻的少女法盲深信自己抗了雷，以至于人生直接崩溃开局（二十多年没问问五岁误杀犯罪么）。不过现在美国有父亲从女儿五岁就开始教射击了，还有十五岁少年的生日礼物——少年款专用武器在黑五促销，共和党号召每个班里都来几个持枪的少年保护安全，民主党号召穿防弹衣上学。少年枪击的普法教育也在一个接着一个案件的发生中，越来越好。（她妹没失忆…就很暗黑了。）
其实剧情并不值四分，但是它反应的内容却是无价的，对于这样的电影，即使我认为前面的一小时三十分钟都是浪费，仅仅是最后的建议也值得我给满分。
还可以吧，但火候欠佳。说不上来，哪儿块有点不得劲儿
诶~我就是不说你绑的不是我妹~诶我就是不说人是我妹杀的~诶我就是个玩儿。（灯塔国JC这么受人尊敬？是反串黑么。6.5/10 1080P 21/12/30
How I feels
含而不露的演出，但一切尽在不言中，真厉害。
总体来说比预期差
桑德拉布洛克用演技撑起的大女主戏，故事很简单，但是张力很强，最后的真相略牵强。
Sandra上手挑战更为严肃与不“讨喜”的角色，精神值得赞扬- -只可惜整个故事被锐化成了一个为了大飙戏特意精心搭建的「演技桥段」大集合，所有角色好像在等待一声令下，就让嘶吼与痛哭迅速就位（Viola忍了又忍，表示老娘这次不约）。它关于如何勇敢，如何继续下去；如何守护，又如何救赎；Ruth的遭遇和心路历程固然感动，但落点却很八点档。许多角色（比如Blake、Emily）都没有得到太多有效的使用，所以让故事变得更加形单影只。Nora在《系统破坏者》即使也有“呈现过度”的分歧，但却完美地捕捉和写实一个具体议题；这次选择的改编材料，不仅将优势完全抛离，还加重了那种情绪展示的拙劣；真的各方面可惜了。
丽贝卡·豪尔、诺拉·芬沙伊德和赵婷是这两年让我非常震撼的三名女性导演，她们的发展轨迹也截然不同，后者是大制片人最喜欢的，前者兼备杰出制片人的眼光，本片的导演则是我最期待的真正意义上的硬核导演，在这部预算相对宽裕、卡司朴素且给力、题材中规中矩的影片中，她完美的控制力展现得近乎溢出，那种极具击打感的节奏、调度和用镜头咬住每一个角色攫取他们的气息、压榨他们的情绪，步步紧逼直到最后，真就一个爽字了得
打完七发子弹，换弹夹，很真实！
作为女性太能理解这样的电影的意义（但电影真的拖沓的让人难以忍受了，印度电影特有的那种镜头和剪辑还有配乐真的好烦）片尾最后的三行字真的让人不寒而栗。这就是女性的现实，就像女主对他的律师男友常说的那句话何尝不是说给自己的呢？such a drama queen…但是不用如此极端的方式没有人会听到她的诉求，这就是现实！女性的现实！太草了…看完电影一看时间今天也是一个星期四…fxxk the society
就是个基本盘吧。重点是绑架小孩但并没有绑架，而是陪小孩看电视？小孩就这么乖吗？我不信。一个女人能看管16个小孩好几个小时这算不算编剧没生活？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
