Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
对Naina的一句话印象深刻: Do we just deserve a fucking candle march? 当悲剧发生的时候，政府又做了什么呢？不负责的警察，惩罚力度欠缺的法律，对受害者的忽视，只追表面报道误导大众的媒体……
用悬疑片的手法拍剧情片，有些部分有点怪怪的，但最后一个拥抱的情感分量很足。
最后的字幕:在看这部电影的期间，有8个女人被强奸。。
虽然剧情有些bug，比如小孩的死、断网、以及总理愿意过来，但是立意真的很可以，不论男女老少，每个人的尊严都应该被法律保护
情感上四星，致敬，毕竟人家能拍出来，在呐喊，即便你知道那光明的结局遥不可及。
演技精湛，Sandra把那种压抑，无奈，无助，愤怒，渴望的感觉演得极其克制，反而让人感受更真实更痛彻心扉。对老美的文化不是很懂，射杀警察是重罪吗？已经承受了法律的制裁还需要忍受社会的判罚吗？不过看完我觉得人其实还是应该多读书才会有更多解决问题的方法，不至于让自己身陷囹圄
立意可以，但是这拍的太理想化了，甚至说有点差。
但该电影吊打《误杀2》
中规中矩。受害者通过暴力行动推动高层正视体制问题，没什么新鲜事，节奏四平八稳。电影工作者的心肠滚烫，能提出问题也就尽责了。
只有桑婆的演技很棒，剧本有些潦草，每一步都在预知范围，结局收尾仓促
解决绑架案方面，细节和合理性有待提高。解决社会问题方面，更是任重道远。
就冲阿三拍出这样的电影，尼玛到了最后再给你惊几下。步步升华，伦理上完美。
印度悬疑电影真的很牛。节奏掌握得很好。印度的女性议题一直都是印度的一个软肋。历史上很多伟大的英雄都违反了法律，但是他们的诉求不能视而不见。。
本片被评论区诟病一些点，恰恰是我最喜欢的：不是每部电影都得剖析所谓人性的复杂，展现朴素的是非观不可以吗？对于女性来说，我们需要最直观的正义。
女主演得好，故事有点狗血，不太能理解女主，为什么不说实话。7/10
整体剧情推进不复杂，后面司机那个转折还是比较到位的。印度敢拍这样的片还是勇气可嘉的。
非常工整！结构上，节奏上，角色上，表演上！这是我桑的最后一部剧情电影了，要珍惜啊！！
虽然但是 就真的完全想到了《三年A班》啊 艺术创作真的太好用别人的创意了 😭
这个话题值得一看 内容略显不够紧凑扎实，警察都不知道里面几个人几把枪犯罪动机就敢冲 也是够虎
说来说去还是强奸案，印度除了这个似乎就没有其他了，节奏过于平淡，观影过程中没有紧张感。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
