Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
比拉面和b级略好，节奏比仙人掌差，但是主题还可以
有一瞬间我觉得这个故事可以换成另一件事
没有配乐，几乎没有场景转换，跟一群人在一场电影里开一场100分钟信息密度极大的会，却丝毫不觉得冗长乏味……回望历史，我们总是清醒的，但，身在当下，我们却经常把疯狂当做理智……
越来越没有什么新意了，很俗套的剧情，已经吃了好多年老本了。
“真是的，大家太没有大仁（大人）样了。”
肥嘟嘟左卫门居然是神谷浩史，好久没看小新剧场版了，哭一鼻子
对不同心境下的涂鸦的区别传达得非常到位，但是剧本感觉真的有大问题，笑点设置重复，情感戏很生硬，我真的有点受不了这样，非得设置个牺牲的苦情人物……结尾又想加一些社会学的人性课题，部分桥段又过于子供向，太割裂了，最后观感真的挺难受的，个人认为不能和《大人帝国》相比较。而且题材真的很新颖嘛?神笔马良应该蛮多人都看过吧……
喜欢画出来的娜娜子 应该多加点戏份 叫蜡笔小新我的手绘女友大突击！
即便大家都在逃跑，但是我野原新之助不会逃跑！春日部防卫队！！fight！！
愚蠢的群众只会责怪，看的我是真来气啊，这类人吃枣药丸💊，人类毁灭主要原因就是这群吃瓜群众。
突然想到三体地球要被遗弃，而人类的选择，揭示了人性最低劣的那一幕
看到泪流不止，三个涂鸦分别是小新的三个分身，涂鸦小裤裤是勇敢机灵的小新，涂鸦娜娜子是满腔热爱的小新，涂鸦肥嘟嘟左卫门是胆小搞笑但又善良的小新；而小新，就是童年曾经的我们，那些胆怯、勇敢、善良与最赤诚的爱。
以一种系统性的体制机制管理运作的官僚行政系统的例行会议，来讨论种族灭绝和大屠杀，这才是不寒而栗的地方，即系统合法且合乎程序的推行反人类的灭绝政策。为了大...
即便大家都在逃跑，但是我野原新之助不会逃跑！春日部防卫队！！fight！！
3星半，7分
之前的“特别处理”，现在的“特别军事行动”
影片脑洞大开，画面色彩斑斓，人物性格突出。剧情来讲有搞笑之时，有感动之处，涉及亲情友情，展现了勇敢、正义、团结等品格和精神，有相遇有离别，突出表现关于成长所要经历、面对和知道的一些东西，很有教育意义。
越来越没有什么新意了，很俗套的剧情，已经吃了好多年老本了。
低幼版拯救世界充满爱，反二向箔大作战，左卫门此时化身盖世英雄。小新还是一如既往地可(猥)爱(琐)。7.2
又是历史意义大于艺术表现。一屋子人讨论也可以像十二怒汉那样精彩，可惜这部令人昏昏欲睡。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
