Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
后来的洗白又太生硬了，突然就变得和蔼可亲了，突然就和米拉贝和解了。
迪斯尼划水，总局也划水。7号上映，6号还没下来发行通知，绝了···
“他们都一样，不管是衣冠楚楚还是衣衫褴褛的家伙，再过两小时，我们谁也分不清谁是疯子、谁是帅哥、谁是囚徒、谁是自由人！”
永远可以相信迪士尼的动画，剧情普通却充满温馨，动画音乐依旧优秀，《Surface Pressure》这首歌最好听 @AMC Waterfront 22（11/23/2021 晚首映）
用现实主义来拍超自然，十分反套路，简直是近代精神病研究弯路和女性迫害实录。。。看后容易引起不适
一群自以为是的男医生随意地用所谓的女疯子做着各种实验，显示自己的学识和能力。女护士们是坚定的执行者，甚至有人借机以折磨病人为乐。被关起来的疯子却治愈着身边的茫然活着的正常人，让她内心得到自由，疯子身体得到自由，一起强大。根据记载那个时代欧洲疯人院多到惊人，满足了很多人的“需要”。
电影画面唯美，稍显压抑。
被打上标签之后，人生很有可能就不是自己的了。所谓命运，并不是人人都有勇气去对抗的东西。
独立自由思想的女性在父权眼里就是通灵的异端女巫，医院精神病院就是宗教裁判所。但是本片电视剧质感，缺乏亮点。
虽然我也是个科学派，但真的很无法理解这种将所有自己不能理解的东西归之于精神病的“学者”，外科制药进步这么多了，精神病治疗基本都没啥变化，哎~~看病院里的可真够绝望了，但双女主演技真好，两人之间的一点“姬”情是影片最温柔的存在，希望以后我们能更好的真正治疗精神病。
无论题材，故事，音乐，演员，画面，都是我喜欢的调调，梅拉尼·罗兰自导自演，女子版《飞越疯人院》。
You are more than the gift.最重要的不是什么天赋和魔法，而是自尊自爱自强。
把女人悲惨的境地用很美的方式表达出来，惊艳!
家里所有人的伤人和洗白，都在莫名其妙的一瞬间，唱首歌就完事儿。家如果是原罪的话，为什么我们还需要要不离不弃？可以看看《为何家会伤人》的案例。如果不是歌还行，应该只有1星。
设定不错，立意不错，但是展开不够，人物太多导致每个人都没有特别深入，甚至连主角都很单薄。尤其是几个兄弟姐妹其实各有各的问题，但是最后老奶奶一句话就轻松解决，有点虎头蛇尾，开头很吸引人，结局却轻飘飘的。歌曲良莠不齐吧，有的好听，有的一般。最近迪斯尼比较注重家庭关系的故事，不像九十年代没完没了的公主王子恋爱，挺好的。我喜欢这个发展方向。
法国人拍的爱情好细腻啊，结尾的台词就是最美的情书，看到最后我悟了，对珍妮来说，身在牢笼就是自由啊。
到底谁是疯的呢，所有精神病院片子都可以问的问题。三星半
女性版本的飞跃疯人院，只不过更加阴郁，结尾如诗般刻画自由，也挺独特
自由是甜中带苦，意识觉醒的古典之美。难以相信我们现在仍正经历相同的事，压制，束缚，偏见，人类几百年的发展依旧是停滞不前。不冷静不听话就是疯子，就要被浸泡在冰水里。也很喜欢女主在两个场景解束腰的节奏对比和象征意义。“很容易明白这个古典故事在当代的意义和指涉，通过超现实元素来消解这种感觉”
我得说女主自导自演把自己拍的很仙。这能通灵一点好处都没有啊，这些鬼魂看来也没什么诚意。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
