Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
很多年不看NBA导致看这个电影的乐趣没有那么多。但是体育运动真的是了不起啊，无论是足球还是篮球，还有乒乓球，各种各样的体育运动，真的了不起。篮球版本的begin again，都得靠互联网。
大博班出来的两场戏我真以为是喜剧...算是篮球大联欢了，不光球星一堆，连教授这种网红也来了，没让他打场对抗真可惜。反正看完之后，胡安是真没演技...总觉着他这个角色是按照东契奇来的吧？
Tobias真帅！演得也不错，全片看看球员教练老板们凑活了，别的就算了
会想到和威尔史密斯相比，亚当桑德勒对自己的职业明显更敬重，更有规划，更爱惜羽毛。犹太人的聪明劲儿。
写给篮球的情书，人到中年，还能搏上一切，再次吹响梦想的号角，简单的像一个童话故事，但中年人，有过篮球梦的中年人，有谁能抵挡得住这种零度可口可乐呢？
运动电影很难拍，要不就是好，要不就是不好，这一部当然是毋庸置疑的好。
俗套的故事，如果不是冲着亚当叔去大概率是不会看，故事流畅但也能看到ZQ时代下的种种“嘲讽”~
Do you love this game? Never back down if the answer is YES！。。有的时候英语不是母语，就不会被trash talk 口头伤害到。。。视频流量时代，杀入联合选秀，要从街头路人王另辟蹊径。。。各路NBA名人堂级大咖来露个脸，这(故)事就算成了。希望现实世界里另个阿Bo(曾凡博)最近也成功呀～(2022.6.22) 评:3.8星
低谷的阶段非常短，但是更显的很燃。最后这个结局很赞，用生命在热爱这项运动，就是让它纵情燃烧。
很多年不看NBA导致看这个电影的乐趣没有那么多。但是体育运动真的是了不起啊，无论是足球还是篮球，还有乒乓球，各种各样的体育运动，真的了不起。篮球版本的begin again，都得靠互联网。
这题材很难拍难看吧 对于我就算拍成纪录片我都可以 老詹要是客串了就好了
因为真的热爱这个运动，这个联盟，所以看到熟悉的球员们，教练们真的很亲切。
第一次觉得打篮球打好了是真的帅！！虽然剧情可以一眼望到头，但是还是让人看的热血沸腾，这种励志的童话故事永远都让人看不腻。
3.5 这里面最菜的就是胡安·埃尔南戈麦斯
很多年不看NBA导致看这个电影的乐趣没有那么多。但是体育运动真的是了不起啊，无论是足球还是篮球，还有乒乓球，各种各样的体育运动，真的了不起。篮球版本的begin again，都得靠互联网。
运动题材电影真的很容易感动人，亚当一把年纪了更令人感动，it's you against you.
太顺了，太熟悉了，会被一闪而过的彩蛋带走关注点忽略人物本身以及这段关系建立的浮皮潦草。好像有那么一点点反思，但却也是不及格的小学语文水平。把他当做一个超级长的NBA联盟广告看就好。
就像吃炸鸡喝可乐一样
很好看！喜欢看nba的会更喜欢～演员表个个都是as himself也挺有趣
请告诉我这样的电影怎样才能拍难看！！！长手长腿的人运动起来真是赏心悦目啊。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
