Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
太经典的日式BE美学，真是又虐又美。像樱花一样要凋谢的我的恋人。
今天也被刀麻了哈🙃
早衰症题材第一次看👀我以为男主会认出老去的女主，结果并没有（预判了我的预判）男主发现粉毛帽子的时候读信真的有伤到，感觉日影很神奇的是，它带来的效益不是立刻显现的，是偶尔哪一天看到类似的事情，然后密密麻麻在心上抓挠的心痛感。
这剧情有点故意煽情 剧情里的一见钟情（仅指此片）真的可以这么相爱吗
本来电影只值三星，多给中岛老师一星鼓励鼓励。我哭得一地都是纸，唯爱狗血🤧比起男女主的爱情，女主和哥哥嫂嫂的羁绊更好哭啊，特别是哥哥背妹妹去诊所和嫂嫂说讨厌我也没关系我不是外人那里，差点把我哭背气😭最后男主发现自己没有认出来女主和试图自杀那里，很明显中岛老师的演技撑不起来，还要多多修炼呀kenty哥哥，会继续为kenty哥哥应援的🥰
嫂子带着美咲去摄影工作室找晴人那一段 嫂子忍哭的表演还挺有感染力的
就是，那个樱花树假的不能再假了。。。
患早衰症的女孩和摄影男生的爱情！多一颗星给最后部分，最后很感动，很煽情，然而前半部分拍的不心动，毫无感染力，BE的本子拍的不好无法上头的话，基本就沦落成老套了。
难看到救命的程度……忍到片尾曲，就当看了一场春天的樱花吧
就喜歡看純愛日劇。女主好可愛，嫂子好美麗。都喜歡怎麽辦？我估計幾乎沒人能看到片尾的彩蛋。
情节太俗套了，主角完全比配角不下去了，哥哥的演员是个好演员
没想到2021年还能看到这么蠢的电影，但话又说回来，原版本来也不值得翻拍。
平平无奇的两个小时…
总体来说很纯爱小清新。
男女主都演的很好很到位，故事并不新颖但是能看出很大的诚意，作为纯爱故事，有梦想，爱情，遗憾，重新出发。有中岛老师的美颜和children的BGM还要求什么呢？
男主最后没认出女主，心塞。最爱樱花和女主哥哥，男主演技真挚但表情管理要加强，女主鼻子很出戏。。
看到美咲长白发就知道要开始虐了 但是没想到这么虐
影片的画面很清新浪漫，真的很有樱花的味道，像影片里的樱花果冻那种色彩。
可能我没什么好恶标准吧，凭着自己感觉打分，小朋友才分好坏。
日本文化的特色，看来看去都是虚伪。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
