Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
挺好看的啊，非常搞笑，剧情逻辑其实也在线啊，豆瓣对这类搞笑国产电影太不友好了，这个分数绝对有点低了，直接拉满～
挺无聊的，这一再说明不是每个人都能当导演，特别是有的人可能戏都还没有演清楚
4 当个背景声儿吧 打信息差空手套员工那段倒挺有意思的
从剧情到人设，定位非常低幼，确实是给刚进青春期的小朋友看的，如果从这个角度切入的话一切或许倒也算合理。另外，我实在是不觉得一句“I'm not like that”就值得起立鼓掌，但也许算是个好的开始吧。歌舞编排还不错，还是很喜欢Lisa，挺好
鼓励，这梗儿玩多了重复了的确撑起一部电影还是吃力
三星半，及格线上的网大，多半星给那一点烟火气
挺有意思的，中间看医生的那几个小情节挺好的。
意外的喜欢，人生确实就像围城，姐妹羡慕互相的选择，难以敞开心扉，个中苦乐只有自己明白
结局还是很温情的. 真的太喜欢丽莎那种古灵精怪的气质了. 就是内特和莉比 真的太成熟了…
emmmmmm，感谢你没进电影院骗钱，送你一颗星
太水了，把所有都放在表面了。部分大人的假模假样令人讨厌
稳定输出，八元不亏五元还赚，吊打大制作烂片。
佳佳自导自演，路边摊小品片，挺好玩，我喜欢他的那个大饼脸老婆
结构简单，故事简单。能感觉出来，导演绝对不是那种自以为是的家伙。一部一部来吧。就踏实的一点点弄。
希望多一点国产的、能完整讲完故事的无厘头电影
有些桥段挺搞笑的，演员表演没问题，就是剧本太平了，冲突不够
崔志佳的又一部自导自演的片子，观感不如东北告别天团，能看出来很多场景都是跟那部一起的，崔的表演方式也基本平移过来，用来解闷还可以，也有其存在的价值。
想想我是为什么下载这部“电影” 再想想为啥有人要拍这部所谓的“电影” 看在只有1个多点小时的时长，换个口味就看了… 特么的… 只能说太年轻… 这题材是真的“小了”… 硬拗…就硬拗…人物设定啥的？我呸！ 哈哈😃我收回我说的话…让他拗让他拗 卧槽 烧烤四大才子吗？我丢🙄 挖槽～烧烤时尚F4吗？我丢～ 致敬食神我真的笑了😊 哎哟喂 归来仍是少年啊！这价值上的，颇感动颇感动 得嘞！加一星吧…是一部有“诚意”的喜剧 小旋风这个👆🏻梗算是整得明明白白呢🤪
看似有点像算是一个烂片的样子 确拍的很有味道和情怀·
很不错的网剧，题材新颖，笑点不俗套，点个赞
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
